The verdict in the Trayvon Martin case on the heels of the
Supreme Court’s gutting of the Voting Rights Act has brought our shared
national legacy of racial division back to the foreground of our political
debates. Now, while the iron is hot, is the
time for theological conversation to strike on this enduring and complicated
issue.
Beyond the political rhetoric of the day, what can the church
say theologically about the legacy of racial division in American culture?
Besides simply saying “racism is sin” (which we should keep
saying), what can the church say on the topic of race to move our conversation
and our shared life forward?
As I began trying to formulate an answer to that question, I
found myself walking around and around answers and ideas but never getting far
beneath the surface. The first draft of
this post was little more than a string of platitudes and bumper-sticker slogans
on ending racism. Rev. Jim Forbes,
former pastor at Riverside Church in NYC, once referred to that sort of
theology as “hoop skirt theology,”- it covers everything but touches nothing.
Why, I began to wonder, am I not able to really go deep into
a theology of anti-racism? Why do I have
so much trouble thinking and writing beyond the platitudes? I ruminated on those questions for a couple
of weeks until it dawned on me. There is
a very simple reason why I have such difficulty talking deeply and formatively
on the subject of race.
I am a racist.
That is my confession.
I am a racist.
I fully realize how loaded that sentence is, but words are important and sometimes we have to call things like they are and not hedge our bets or soften our words. I define racism here not in terms of superiority of one group over another but as the persistent habit of seeing difference in other people before anything else.
I am not a KKK banner waving racist like David Duke or a
hate spewing racist like the pastor in Florida who keeps burning the Koran or
even a passive aggressive racist like half of the United States Congress. My racism is less cartoonish and frankly more
troubling. Now, I want to be clear at
this point and say that I do not set out to be a racist. In fact, I like to think of myself as being
pretty sensitive to the subject. I
cannot conceive of actively discriminating against another person for just
about any reason. Mine is not overt
hate-racism. Mine is that insidious form
of silent American racism that goes unnoticed and, like a lurking malignancy,
undiagnosed for years until it eats you away from the inside. It is the kind of racism that is unintentional but no less harmful. That is my sin. (Well one of them anyway)
We like to behave as though racism is just hate. To be sure, in its most insidious and often violent form it is. But racism is not reserved to the hatemongers and those who promote a politics of fear of the other. Sometimes it is silent. And silent racism in America is too easily and too often ignored.
This kind of American racism is not rooted in hate but in a
focus on the otherness of a person of a different race. For example, I do not dislike or disrespect
the President because he is an African-American. (In fact, I still have the bottle of wine my
mother and I used to toast his election in 2008 and I am proud that our nation
elected its first African-American President.)
But when I see him on television or in the newspaper, I see a black man
before I see a President. I see what is
different about him before I see anything else.
(I have to confess feeling a little indicted by the President when he
pointed to just that sort of racism in his impromptu speech in late July.)
The lingering liberal in me wants to say, “Well, difference
is good. Difference is diversity.” And I
suppose that is true on some level. It
is our differences that give definition and depth to our diversity and that is
a good thing. However, before diversity
can really be appreciated, we have to learn to define it in terms of our
commonality. We are diverse to be sure,
however we are diverse within a shared humanity.
Yet our shared humanity is rarely the first thing we
see. We see race, gender identity, age,
physical capability and all manner of physical differences before we see what it is we share- our humanity. Silent American racism (and its partners
sexism, homophobia, ageism and others) is the habitual and uncritical
willingness to see the difference in another person before seeing our shared
humanity if we see it at all.
In her wonderful book From
Disgust to Humanity, philosopher Martha Nussbaum calls American culture out
on our habitual pattern of creating boogeymen out of whole groups of people. Although Nussbaum focuses on GLBTQ
discrimination, her argument applies to the problem of silent racism as
well. Even silent racism creates
categories of people based on assumed differences that categorize those people
as “not like me.” We create an image that gives us permission to treat that
group and any member of it as other; as less than. (It
was fascinating how many times stories about Trayvon Martin that characterized
him as a young black male wearing a hoodie with pot in his system were followed
immediately with a picture of the President.) Nussbaum advocates for a “politics
of humanity” that resists this silent form of discrimination in favor of a
political culture rooted in our common humanity.
What Nussbaum advocates for in the political sphere, the
church must advocate in the theological.
Don’t we claim that we are ALL children of God? What greater witness can we make to the unity
we have in Christ than creating a culture that focuses first on our shared
humanity? Our shared created-ness in the
image of God? Before anything else, we are all children of
the Living God. Transcending any
possible division or category we might impose, we are all one in God’s family.
There is holiness in that message. There is holiness in proclaiming the love, hope
and unity of Jesus Christ. There is
holiness in declaring that before anything in the world that might seek to
divide us, we are united in the eyes of God; each of us wonderfully made and
precious in God’s sight. What a daring
and faithful message that would be in the world! What a bold church we would be if we only had
the courage to proclaim it!
Dr. King called Sunday morning worship the most segregated
hour in the week. It was true when he
said it nearly half a century ago and it is true today. Even the church is not immune to silent
racism. We have a long way to go to
become the people God desires us to be and a long way to go to become a
community of common humanity bearing witness to the world.
In the meantime, there is grace. Amazing grace for those of us who still have a
way to go; who still have some work to do in the journey from difference to
humanity.
Racism has been called “America’s original sin” and it is
going to take time for us to overcome it, however just because it is difficult
does not mean that we do not try.
They say the first step is admitting you have a problem.
No more silence; that is the first step.
Anyone ready to take it with me?
1 comment:
That's a very clear mirror you held up in your article today-I'm willing to start taking that step myself!
Thank you!
Post a Comment